Showing posts with label Joel Edgarton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joel Edgarton. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Gatsby is a Mixed Bag, with Elements,that work and some which Fail, but Overall it's an Entertaining Experience.

The Great Gatsby (2 1/2 out of 5 Stars)
Director: Baz Lurhman (Romeo + Juliet, Moulin Rouge, Australia)
Written by: Baz Lurhmann, and Craig Pearce (Moulin Rouge)
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire, and Carey Mulligan

There are two ways to view this film, as an avid fan of literature who read and loved the book, or as film goer who has either never read the book or willing to let the book be manipulated into something different.  I am torn. I waited over a week to see the film, and I let the dust of the incredibly negative reviews settle.  I asked friends their opinions, and the reviews were mixed from love to hate i figure I had to settle this on my own.  What I found was a film that entertained me, but as avid fan of the beautiful novel angered me as well, as though I were a bi-polar film critic.


For me to summarize the film would be an insult, and if you have not read the book as most have you have missed out.  For those who do not know the story, the film centers on Nick Carraway (Maguire) who is narrates the story of his time living in West Egg on Long Island.  Nick's cottage is right next to the illustrious and elusive Gatsby (DiCaprio) who throws lavish parties almost constantly.  As Nick enters the world of privilege through his cousin Daisy (Mulligan) and her husband Tom (Joel Edgerton).  Tom was born into money, and he Daisy live in East Egg.  As the roaring 20s begin Nick gets dragged through the world of all these people, seeing the good, the bad, and the ugly.

That's as basic theme to this film, the good, the bad, and the ugly.  The film is a mixed bag, and the person responsible for all of this is producer, director, and writer Baz Lurhmann.  Lurhamann is the central force of gravity within his films.  All things come from him, his wife (Catherine Martin) is also a major part of all of his films.  Martin did production design on all of his films starting with Strictly Ballroom (1992), and has been a producer since Romeo + Juliet (1996).  Lurhmann has also written all of his films with Craig Pearce, except the most atrocious Australia (2008).  These three are back, and appear to be the core team behind this modern re-telling of one of the most classic pieces of American literature.  The question for many is did they capture this book, and the answer is yes and no.

Let's start with the problems, and that is namely Lurhmann himself who only recently (within the last many years according to his interview) became enamored with this story.  Lurhmann looks to be making Gatsby meets Moulin Rouge with a splash of Jay-Z.  I love Moulin Rouge, one of my favorite musicals of all time, and there is the element of the tragic love story in both, but they are different tales.  Lurhmann's lavish and fun parties mixed with drug trips feel too much like Moulin Rouge, and not like anything new or different.  On the good side this makes the movie a little more fun than the 1974 Jack Clayon version, which is a lot more subtle.  Lurhmann also needs to focus his direction a little bit more he lets length draw things out, and prevent his stories from being refined works of art. 

The script is probably one of the biggest problems.  Many of the major motifs of the book are in this film, the whole concept of the 20s, bootlegging, Prohibition, the Jazz Age, and the build up to the Depression.  Looking at the haves versus have nots, and old money versus new money was a major part of this book, and some Fitzgerald focused on as though he knew the fall or crash was coming.  Fitzgerald and his book were intuitive, and this film proves the theme does transcend time.  As financial woes become a major issue today, the film handles this topic well, showing the callous way in which people with money view the world, and the way things may not have changed.  While the film does not delve too deep into these issues they are present to make their mark and divide the characters.

The script misses the mark on many of the characters, including Daisy. I do not know if the film made me hate Daisy, but the only reason I did was because well I have read the book, and she is terrible person.  Mulligan played her part well enough, but the script from Lurhmann and Pearce made her more into a victim who was being fought over by two selfish men.  Tom is so brutish in this film, and he is in the book as well, but it almost becomes an over exaggeration, which forces you to feel sorry for Daisy because she has become a victim in the game between these two men.  Daisy is not victim; she is in fact the culprit to her own demise.   In the beginning Daisy states "All right...I'm glad it's a girl.  And. I hope she's a fool--that's the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool." Daisy's quote at the beginning should have signaled this direction for her character, but instead her foolishness becomes more pity.

In order to more closely resemble the book Lurhmann and Pearce used direct quotes from the book.  I liked this and thought it worked overall, but when you alter the material in film loses it's steam.  It's also a problem when you have Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway the center of the film.  Maguire is one of the most wooden actor's out there; he is dry, wooden, and his emotional reactions do not come across as effective.  Maguire is the most miscast person in this film; he is not Nick Carraway.  This was the biggest problem with the film.  All of the elements people are frustrated with could be overlooked, but this role being miscast is a massive problem.  The story, and film hinge on Nick more so than Gatsby because Nick is your guide through the world of these deplorable people, but Maguire never sells the words, which Fitzgerald so beautifully put to paper.

One performance the film got right for me was Leonardo DiCaprio as J. Gatsby.  Robert Redford portrayed Gatsby well, getting the confidence part down but missing little insecurities and vulnerability.  DiCaprio hits these moments out of the park, especially the little obsessions like with the green light on the dock, or making sure his first meeting with Daisy is perfect.  DiCaprio is a great actor, and you see the flaws within the character because of his performance.  The rest of the cast loses these elements or they become muddled because of some over exaggeration.

I know many people will a problem with the flashy green screen, and the 3-D, but I found these elements to bring this world to life.  While I do not always love a lot of green screen or 3-D.  I found myself sucked in by the technical aspects of this film.  I think this film used 3-D well, and sucked me into the fast paced scenes, the lavish parties, and the journey through all the different worlds.  Simon Duggan's cinematography is spell binding, although  most of this is reliant of some gorgeous visual effects.  Lurhmann's better half Catherine Martin is the star of this film, her production and costume design are some of the best I have seen all year.  I want to run out and buy Gatsby's pink suit, and Nick's green cardigan (for sale at Brooks Brothers), they are flawless elements adding to the beauty of the look of this film.

The music within the film can be a distraction at times, but Jay-Z compilation of modern music with a 20s big band style feel, and Craig Armstrong's score help make this some memorable music.  Lana Del Rey's "Young and Beautiful" is this film's "Come What May" and it's haunting tone sets the tone perfectly for the tragic love story between Daisy and Gatsby.  

The music, the cars, the design they all scream 1920s, making these elements work in the film are important.  They add to the romanticism of this era, and of J. Gatsby himself.  This time period was a build up to the depression, and this book, and film to some extent capture the rise of the self made men to their downfall.  I think the film does a good job at tearing away at the illusions of this decade.  Were Gatsby and Daisy meant to be, or was their brief foray into love before the War (World War I) something which jaded them.  This theme of being jaded runs throughout the film, and book proving some success.

Overall the film is a mixed bag, with a weak screenplay direction, and poor casting.  The film is saved by some of the tried and true themes of the book, DiCaprio, and some incredible technical aspects.  One of the major problems is that sometimes a classic book is just that a classic, no one will ever be perfectly pleased, and there are elements which will never be just right.  I think Gatsby has elements, which work and some which fail, but overall it's an entertaining experience.


Friday, January 11, 2013

Zero Dark Thirty is a Thrilling Ride into the Search for a Monster

Zero Dark Thirty (5 out of 5 Stars)
Directed by Kathryn Bigelow (The Hurt Locker)
Written by Mark Boal (The Hurt Locker)
Starring: Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler, and Joel Edgarton


The film that has wowed the critics, and myself has gotten too much attention for the subject of torture rather than the the quality of the film.  In a recent interview with director Kathryn Bigelow David Letterman broaches the subject, and Bigelow handles it beautifully stating that this film was not a point by point plotting, but used events and people to create the basis for one of the greatest manhunts of all time.  While torture is an element of this story, the film does not attempt to take a moral stand point on this subject, and many are criticizing Bigelow and Boal for letting this subject matter exist.  Bigelow was right in her interview torture happened, and moving forward the focus should be on the actual film.

For those living under a rock, Zero Dark Thirty focuses on the almost ten year search for terrorist Osama Bin Laden.  The film starts with the horrific calls to 911 on September 11, 2001.  From those first haunting moments the film follows a ten search for al-Quaeda terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden, and his death by a team of Navy S.E.A.L.S.  The film centers on Maya (Chastain) and CIA agent hell bent on Bin Laden's capture and death.  Maya works through torture, intelligence, and even attack to capture Bin Laden.

In an allegorical sense Maya represents director Kathryn Bigelow.  Bigelow is one the best working of the best working directors, and like Maya she operates in a man's world.  Many have made this comparison, and while they are right, Bigelow has proven herself to not be defined by gender.  Bigelow's direction is some of the best work this year; she helps take this film through different levels building the momentum.  Bigelow creates an aura around these real life events telling one of the most compelling stories of the year.  

Bigelow's last picture The Hurt Locker, was named Best Picture, and she was named Best Director; she was the first women to win Best Director.  In both of these films there is a sense of reality that films often lose when they enter the war zone.  Bigelow combines this realism in action which trascends beautifully from working with screenwriter mark Boal once again.  The team of Bigelow and Boal is a force to be reckoned with, and there is no stopping the way this duo put words on the screen.  Boal's screenplay is more than a chronicle, but an aptly drawn out battle, which forces you to intently observe the nuances of this search, and ultimately a battle play out.  In other hands this screenplay could have been simple ay a procedural, but this film succeeds to characterize not only the fight but even the smallest character.

Boal uses Maya to drive the story forward, and boy is Maya one BAMF (bad ass mother fucker).  From the first moments when Maya arrives to see Dan (Jason Clarke) while he tortures Ammar to get information from him you can tell Maya is willing to take on this challenge at any cost.  Chastain is brilliant as Maya; she is tough, vulnerable, funny, and hardcore.  In one scene she meets with the C.I.A.  director played by James Gandolfinni, and he asks what else have you done besides this, and Maya responds with a simple "nothing."  Maya pushes the limits, and Chastain's performance is one of the bravest performances of the entire year.  Last year Chastain proved she has talents on all levels with roles in Take Shelter, Tree of Life, The Help, and a few more; she was the breakout performer of the year, and this film proves just how much she can carry one of the best films of the year.

Chastain is the lone character who lasts throughout the whole film, but the team of Bigelow and Boal know how to characterize the rest of the ensemble.  From a brilliant performance by Jason Clarke as Dan whose torture techniques make you cringe with disbelief capture the brutal realism to Joel Edgarton and Chris Pratt who play Navy S.E.A.L.S. going into to get the kill.   This is one incredible ensemble, and Bigelow, and Boal make sure to flesh out the realistic moments with every moment of the film.

This is one of the best films of the year, the subject matter is handled beautifully, by the geniuses Bigelow, and Boal.  Along with Chastain this team is complete, and they work together effortlessly. Zero Dark Thirty is a thrilling ride into the search for a monster, and never lets you leave the edge of your seat.


Monday, March 19, 2012

Warrior Pummels You, Making You Root for both Protagonist , but Sometimes they beat the Message to Death

Warrior (3 out of 5 Stars)
Directed by Gavin O'Connor (Tumbleweeds, Miracle)
Written by Gavin O'Connor, Anthony Tambakis, and Cliff Dorfman
Starring: Tom Hardy, Joel Edgerton, Jennifer Morrison, and Nick Nolte


Warrior pummels you, making you root for both of the protagonist  but sometimes O'Connor beats the message to death.

The film follows two brothers who are battling their own familial, financial, and physical fights.  Tommy Conlon (Tom Hardy) shows up at his dad's home with a piece offering of whiskey.  Paddy Conlon (Nolte) refuses the gesture but invites his son who has not seen in years into his home.  Tommy has walked into his fathers life and into a gym only to beat a strong contender for the Sparta mixed martial arts competition.  Tommy soon becomes a huge youtube sensation, and as this video goes viral his 'brothers' fighting overseas see the video.  Tommy starts to train with his father for the competition.

As Tommy is battling his own familial demons with his father his brother Brendan a high school physics teacher battles with financial hardships.  Brendan starts to take fights in order to pay off payments for his house.  As he continues to push himself he goes to an old friend to start to train him to be a better fighter.  When his friends star fighter gets injured Brendan pushes himself to go to the very same competition his brother has entered.

The film sounds riddle with cliches, and there are moments when the film dives head first into the pit falls of the typical fight movies.  The main problem with the film is the script.  The team that wrote this script often slips into the familiar all too often, but then like underdog Brendan O'Connor they knock you out with some game changers.  The film's cliche drunken father is saved through the performance by Nick Nolte who embodies this sad sack dead beat dad with such pain and misery.  Nolte gives one of the most gut wrenchingly raw performances.

Even though its O'Connor who helped contribute to the screenplay his direction helps save the film; he provides some incredibly raw moments that make you go back and forth between rooting for the two brothers.  Who do you want to win?  The incredibly brilliant yet quiet Hardy who plays Tommy who vows his purse to a widow of his friend from the Iraq War.  Then there is Brendan the man who has fought his entire life for everything he has from his wife (Morrison) to his house, and even the opportunity to be in the ring at the end.O'Connor builds the tension with finesse and strong direction leaving you feel as though he accomplished some incredible feat.